The first Saturday of June is National Trails Day. I think that it should be leveraged to promote trail use, volunteerism wrt cleanups, as a day to celebrate opening new trails, facilities, etc. ("
Thousands of volunteers help maintain WA trails each year,"
Seattle Times).
Too often it isn't.
The American Hiking Society is the lead, but federal agencies, at least they used to, like the National Park Service and the US Forest Service were big celebrants.
Biking and walking access is a big part of trails and Trails Day events.
US Forest Service lands are free access on Trails Day. They have a lot of volunteer and other events that day, all over the country.
National Parks aren't free that day.
1. Last month, while doing park playground evaluation for a grant application, I realized besides most places not having enough signage calling attention to trails, that trail signage could be augmented with information/icons pointing people to nearby services like restrooms or air pumps--bike maps often do this, but not signs.
-- "May is National Bicycle Month | More on the concept of adding services icons to bicycle route wayfinding signage"
2. Years ago, I was blown away by a trail study for Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) Ohio (Cuyahoga Greenways Plan) that did demographic studies about the increased range of jobs made available through the expansion of trail networks.
I haven't stayed in close touch with bike planning best practice over the past few years, but I think this plan is definitely worth reading in terms of how it lays out goals and evaluation criteria for route selection, and even branding!
3. The basic idea is
building a network for cycling. I like the way an old German National Bicycle Plan illustrated the point.
- within neighborhoods
- one mile radius from schools and bus stops and transit stations
- three mile radius from "town centers"
- along corridors
- between corridors
- connections within and to parks, which I called a County bikeway network
- connections to neighboring jurisdictions (Baltimore County has borders with Baltimore City, Anne Arundel County, Howard County, Carroll County and Harford County in Maryland, and York County in Pennsylvania.
4. With regard to trails as networks and infrastructure, urban trails can be particularly good at connecting neighborhoods to parks, libraries, shopping districts, grocery stores, schools and other civic assets. The Northwest Branch Trail in Prince George's County does this very well--and it's the first trail that I really rode on that made me realize the value of trails versus street riding.
On the street, so much of your mental energy is occupied on defensive cycling. You can drop a lot of that when riding trails, except for gauging the movement of pedestrians, little kids, dogs, roller bladers, scooter riders, skateboarders, etc.
On the Baltimore and Annapolis Trail and the Indianapolis Cultural Trail, brewpubs in Iowa, etc. many businesses have opened rear entries to link to the adjoining trail.
The patio and 606 Trail access point at Wolf & Company in Bucktown. Credit: Quinn Myers/Block Club Chicago.
They specifically chose that building because it could support multiple concepts, including the trail.
Ironically, the
606 Trail was created to serve a lower income area of Chicago ("
Lessons from The 606," DePaul University Institute of Housing Studies) but the Bucktown neighborhood where the restaurant is, is decidedly upscale.
The top floor is a cafe with coffee, tea and other drinks.
With a butcher case like this, and prices to match, the market is definitely a lot more than a typical convenience store focused on selling snacks and soda.
So Wolf & Company is three concepts: cafe; restaurant and bar; and upscale market, in one, connecting both to the 606 Trail and the Bucktown neighborhood.
5. Speaking of branding, how about Promoting Bikeway Networks through Postcards? The Alta Trail Map postcard below pictures their trails for winter skiing. I like the icons they use to denote the various amenities at different trailheads. Ski resorts promote mountain biking in summers as a way to build revenue off-season, and publish trail maps.
Relatedly, the Ketchum Idaho Visitor Center has trail maps posted on its walls. As do some other groups. But rarely bicycle shops.
8. the biggest issue in bicycle planning to me is not the development, construction and implementation of infrastructure and facilities, but providing the assistance people need to make the transition from automobile-centricity to biking.
I write about that here:
-- "Revisiting assistance programs to get people biking: 26 programs"
10. E-bikes can help a lot. Years ago I was critical about e-biking, because I thought "regular" bikes worked in cities--especially in flat areas--just fine ("(Still) tired of mis-understanding of the potential for e-bikes."
E-bikes have the added benefit of
- extending the distance people are willing to commute by bike
- making it easier for aging seniors to continue biking
- making it easier to bike in hilly conditions
- making a bicycle trip more competitive with car travel in terms of time, so that people actually switch trips from a car to a bike.
From Reddit. An Amazon e-bike vehicle making deliveries in DC. Although some worry about such vehicles blocking bike lanes. 11. Making cycling irresistible. But my earlier position on "the right way to use electric bikes" made me remember job isn't to make plans about how I think people should bike. It should be about building the conditions to make bicycling irresistible
-- "Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany," Transport Reviews (2008).
I used that paper as the foundation for this piece, which was commissioned at the time by the DC Bicycle Advisory Committee in response to a Rails to Trails Conservancy initiative.
-- "Ideas for making bicycling irresistible in Washington DC" (2008)
In writing, I made the point that DC is urban and should lay out an urban agenda for biking, as opposed to the more suburban and rural biking "sense" of the rails to trails movement.
I see one of the ideas, delivery services using bike-based vehicles is just now being implemented in DC.
I like the usually these programs provide more support for those of lesser means. But I think that they should be loan deductible programs like in in
England or
Ireland. Sometimes, they are funded through carbon tax programs and similar kinds of impact fees.
14. E-bikes on trails (and beaches) can be problematic. On trails it is because they are faster than people on foot or regular bike. And certain types of e-vehicles aren't bicycles, but more akin to motorcycles ("
Iowa City needs a nuanced conversation about e-bikes,"
Iowa City Press-Citizen, "
Iowa cities team up to promote e-bike safety on trails and sidewalks," Iowa Public Radio/NPR, "
E-bikes are all over mountain trails. Some want them banned," "
In the South Bay, e-bikes are restricted along the beach. Yet they’re still everywhere,"
Los Angeles Times, "
Moab Opened 200 Miles of Trail to E-Bikes. I Was One of the First to Ride Them (Legally),"
Outside). From the first article:
Anyone who regularly uses Iowa City trails has likely seen the tension already developing: riders moving too quickly through crowded pedestrian areas, oversized throttle-powered bikes built more like motorcycles than bicycles, and parents purchasing machines online without realizing they may exceed Iowa’s legal definition of an e-bike.
A sign posted at a trail entrance to the Aliso Wood Canyon Wilderness Park
in Aliso Viejo, California restricts e-bike usage.
That matters because Iowa City has spent decades building trails designed to function as shared public spaces. Pedestrians, runners, wheelchair users, cyclists and families with strollers all use the same network. That system works because speed differences remain relatively manageable and predictable. A 12 mph difference matters on a crowded trail. A 30 mph difference changes the character of a shared trail completely.
Unfortunately, the public conversation often collapses into two extremes. Either all e-bikes are treated as dangerous, or any discussion of regulation is dismissed as anti-bike hysteria. Both reactions miss the point. Most e-bike riders are responsible, and many are exactly the kind of people cities should want out of cars and onto trails. E-bikes reduce traffic, parking demand, and transportation barriers for people who might not otherwise ride at all. At the same time, it is reasonable to acknowledge that high-speed electric motorcycles do not belong on crowded recreational paths simply because they have pedals attached.
Ketcham, Idaho.
There is clear value for promoting senior biking as a fitness measure. Let's make it easy. People with lower incomes could get a match--the check doesn't go all that far for many and i can be difficult to save up for big expenditures.
I think all senior center programs should develop and implement similar kinds of programs.
17. Acknowledge and respond to climate change. Trails should consider adding push button mister stations to deal with the heat.
Water stations where they can be installed, based on access to utilities.
Add shade structures and tree plantings. With the aim that over decades, the trees become tall enough to provide significant shade.
A mister on a playground.
Labels: bicycle and pedestrian planning, global warming and climate change, heat, parks and open space, parks and trails, parks planning, public lands, public realm framework, sustainable mobility, urban design/placemaking